BuyTrust

27 Alexander St

27 Alexander St, Vancouver

Year built: 1997Neighbourhood: StrathconaType: Type not confirmed

Representative building photo · Photo: David William Rose

The area around 27 Alexander St

Loading map…

Commercial Drive $1,975East Vancouver $1,988Strathcona $2,220West End $2,300Mount Pleasant $2,495Downtown Vancouver $2,700

Median 1-bed rents in surrounding neighbourhoods.

Tribunal flag · Free

No tribunal disputes on file

PropTrust provides statistical analysis of publicly available tribunal decisions. This is not legal advice. For advice about your specific situation, consult a licensed lawyer or paralegal in your province.

Zondo about this building · by PropTrust

Ask Zondo about this building

Ask about 27 Alexander St's tribunal history, permits, or the Strathcona area — grounded in this building's own record. Zondo also covers mortgages, lenders, and renewal questions.

People are asking

Answers draw on all 11 researched Canadian lenders and live Bank of Canada rate data. Not financial advice. Not your bank. Your document isn't stored.

No disputes on record — era risks to check

Building health

No tribunal history on record. 7 construction-era topics to check for a 1997 Vancouver building.

Tribunal cases

Tribunal issues

Era topics

Matched permits

Top things to check

Leaky-condo envelope failure (face-sealed era) — construction eraGlass-tower window-wall & sealed-unit failure — construction eraKitec plumbing (dezincification) — construction eraPolybutylene (Poly-B) plumbing — construction era

A synthesis of the record and era sections below — a starting read, not a building inspection or an appraisal.

Building Record · Tribunal

No tribunal history on record for this building. That's a clean signal — no adjudicated disputes found in BC CRT / Ontario tribunal data.

Building Record · Permits

1 address-matched permit

2018. Work on record is a maintenance/investment signal, not a red flag on its own.

Renovations & alterations ×1

Only permits confidently matched to this building's address are shown; broader permit linkage is still being validated.

Building-Era Findings

What to watch in a 1997 Vancouver building

Issues commonly associated with this building's construction era, type and area. These are patterns to check, not confirmed findings for this specific building.

7 era/typology topics to review · 5 higher-cost

We haven't confirmed this building's construction type yet. Items tagged if applicable depend on it (e.g. glass tower vs. wood-frame).

Envelope & Structure

Leaky-condo envelope failure (face-sealed era)

if applicableHigh

Wood-frame, stucco-clad buildings built with "face-sealed" walls that relied on a perfect outer seal and had no drainage/ventilation (rainscreen) cavity.

Rainscreen construction was only mandated in the BC Building Code around 1999; buildings before that trapped wind-driven rain behind the stucco, causing hidden rot and mould.

What it means for you: Envelope failure drives multi-million-dollar remediation and special levies. Many buildings have since been rainscreen-remediated — the key question is whether this one was.

Cost signal: Full rainscreen retrofit is six-figures+ per building; ~45% of BC strata units from this era were affected.

Check: Depreciation report, envelope/rainscreen remediation history, and any warranty on the remediation.

Source: en.wikipedia.org

Glass-tower window-wall & sealed-unit failure

if applicableHigh

Floor-to-ceiling window-wall and curtain-wall assemblies whose structural silicone joints fatigue from UV, thermal cycling and wind deflection, and whose sealed double-glazed units (IGUs) fog and fail.

The glass-tower construction boom used envelope systems now known to degrade; failures typically appear 15–25 years after construction.

What it means for you: A looming, building-wide window-wall replacement is one of the largest special-levy risks in a modern tower.

Cost signal: Exterior re-seal lasts only 10–15 years before repeat or full facade replacement; full replacement runs into the millions.

Check: Foggy/failed sealed units, glazing-joint condition, and whether the reserve plan funds a window-wall replacement.

Source: cbc.ca, iibec.org

Systems

Kitec plumbing (dezincification)

High

PEX-AL-PEX composite piping with high-zinc brass fittings; the zinc leaches out (dezincification), leaving weak, porous fittings prone to sudden bursts, and hot lines can delaminate above 82°C.

Installed 1995–2007 (used in the GTA to ~2011); recalled in 2005.

What it means for you: Many insurers refuse to cover buildings with Kitec and demand proactive building-wide repiping.

Cost signal: Repiping ranges from $5,000 to over $25,000 per suite; the class-action claim deadline has passed.

Check: Fittings marked "Kitec"/"PEX-AL-PEX" (orange + brass); confirm whether the building has been repiped.

Source: squareone.ca

Polybutylene (Poly-B) plumbing

High

Grey plastic supply piping that micro-fractures when exposed to chlorinated municipal water, presenting extreme burst risk.

Popular 1978–1997 (peak 1993); removed from the National Plumbing Code in 2005.

What it means for you: Standard unit-owner policies often exclude or place high deductibles on Poly-B water damage.

Cost signal: Failure rate ~95% within 10–15 years; repipe cost per unit is significant.

Check: Grey flexible plastic pipe at the manifold/fixtures; repipe certificate.

Source: urbanpiping.com

Soft-water copper pinhole leaks

High

Metro Vancouver’s soft, mineral-free water cannot form a protective scale inside copper pipes, so chlorinated water pits the bare copper and creates microscopic pinhole leaks.

Affects any building with bare copper supply lines; risk grows with pipe age (decades).

What it means for you: Silent leaks weep behind drywall causing rot and mould; through concrete slabs a single leak can cascade down multiple floors, causing extensive damage.

Cost signal: Some stratas install chemical-injection systems (e.g. Hytec) to coat pipe interiors as mitigation.

Check: History of pinhole-leak claims, pipe age, and whether an injection/mitigation system is installed.

Mechanical & Ventilation

Summer overheating in glass towers

if applicableMedium

Early glass high-rises with floor-to-ceiling glazing and small restrictive windows, often built without central AC or heat pumps, that absorb massive solar heat loads.

Pre-dates common in-suite cooling; south/west units act as greenhouses and stay sweltering into the night.

What it means for you: Comfort and, for investors, tenant-retention risk; retrofitting cooling is disruptive and may be restricted by the strata.

Check: In-suite cooling provisions, window operability, and any building cooling upgrades.

Corridor pressurization / make-up-air overheating

if applicableLow

Rooftop make-up-air units (MAUs) that pressurize corridors for odour and smoke control but, when older, lack cooling coils.

Older MAUs push superheated rooftop air into hallways in summer, turning corridors into heat reservoirs that worsen suite overheating.

What it means for you: A comfort issue and a sign of aging common-system equipment due for upgrade.

Check: MAU age and whether cooling coils have been added.

Era and typology patterns are general guidance, not a building inspection. Confirm each item against the depreciation report, strata minutes, and a professional inspection.

Unlock the full report

$99 one-time

Building-health summary — one synthesized read on the building
Tribunal disputes broken down by category, with case-level detail
Permit history — what work has been done and when
Construction-era risk analysis for this building's age and type

Reports are one-time purchases per building. No subscription.

← More sample reports Buyers Hub →