BuyTrust

FARO at Bridgeland

120 7a St NE, Calgary

Year built: 2006Neighbourhood: BridgelandType: Type not confirmed

Tribunal flag · Free

No tribunal disputes on file

PropTrust provides statistical analysis of publicly available tribunal decisions. This is not legal advice. For advice about your specific situation, consult a licensed lawyer or paralegal in your province.

Zondo about this building · by PropTrust

Ask Zondo about this building

Ask about FARO at Bridgeland's tribunal history, permits, or the Bridgeland area — grounded in this building's own record. Zondo also covers mortgages, lenders, and renewal questions.

People are asking

Answers draw on all 11 researched Canadian lenders and live Bank of Canada rate data. Not financial advice. Not your bank. Your document isn't stored.

Clean record — routine era checks only

Building health

No tribunal history on record. 2 construction-era topics to check for a 2006 Calgary building.

Tribunal cases

Tribunal issues

Era topics

Matched permits

Top things to check

Kitec plumbing (dezincification) — construction era

A synthesis of the record and era sections below — a starting read, not a building inspection or an appraisal.

Building Record · Tribunal

No tribunal history on record for this building. That's a clean signal — no adjudicated disputes found in BC CRT / Ontario tribunal data.

Building-Era Findings

What to watch in a 2006 Calgary building

Issues commonly associated with this building's construction era, type and area. These are patterns to check, not confirmed findings for this specific building.

2 era/typology topics to review · 1 higher-cost

We haven't confirmed this building's construction type yet. Items tagged if applicable depend on it (e.g. glass tower vs. wood-frame).

Systems

Kitec plumbing (dezincification)

High

PEX-AL-PEX composite piping with high-zinc brass fittings; the zinc leaches out (dezincification), leaving weak, porous fittings prone to sudden bursts, and hot lines can delaminate above 82°C.

Installed 1995–2007 (used in the GTA to ~2011); recalled in 2005.

What it means for you: Many insurers refuse to cover buildings with Kitec and demand proactive building-wide repiping.

Cost signal: Repiping ranges from $5,000 to over $25,000 per suite; the class-action claim deadline has passed.

Check: Fittings marked "Kitec"/"PEX-AL-PEX" (orange + brass); confirm whether the building has been repiped.

Source: squareone.ca

Mechanical & Ventilation

Corridor pressurization / make-up-air overheating

if applicableLow

Rooftop make-up-air units (MAUs) that pressurize corridors for odour and smoke control but, when older, lack cooling coils.

Older MAUs push superheated rooftop air into hallways in summer, turning corridors into heat reservoirs that worsen suite overheating.

What it means for you: A comfort issue and a sign of aging common-system equipment due for upgrade.

Check: MAU age and whether cooling coils have been added.

Era and typology patterns are general guidance, not a building inspection. Confirm each item against the depreciation report, strata minutes, and a professional inspection.

Unlock the full report

$99 one-time

Building-health summary — one synthesized read on the building
Tribunal disputes broken down by category, with case-level detail
Permit history — what work has been done and when
Construction-era risk analysis for this building's age and type

Reports are one-time purchases per building. No subscription.

← More sample reports Buyers Hub →